« ARC's Green Equity Toolkit: Advancing Race, Gender and Economic Equity in the Green Economy | Main | Harlem Gospel Choir says no to Glenn Beck »

Tuesday, December 01, 2009


Dan Mintz

In your world is it possible intellectually support a 'free and open internet' but be considered that supporters use as a 'good' reason the opportunity to drive speech they find abhorent (Beck, Dobbs) away?

Is it possible that the same arguments used to get rid of Beck and Dobbs can be used to get rid of the authors?

Are the 'rest of us' stuck with the cacaphony of those who can't get along in the sandbox, but who are trapped in a world without irony and nuance?

- Dan

The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    aN blogroll

    Thanx for stopping by!