Republicans recant plans to foreclose voters but admit other strategies

By Eartha Jane Melzer
Courtesy of The Michigan Messenger
A Center for Independent Media site
(Originally published on 9/11/08)

The Macomb County Republican Party chair who told Michigan Messenger earlier this week that Republicans planned to challenge voters at the polls using a list of foreclosed homes has changed his story.

James Carabelli now says the party has “no plans to do anything,” according to a story in the Macomb Daily.

Reports of the plan for foreclosure-based challenges have spurred outrage and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) planned a demonstration today at the Macomb County Republican headquarters.

Eric Doster is former counsel for the Michigan Republican Party and a lawyer who plans to represent GOP election challengers on Election Day.

Doster returned a call Wednesday afternoon and in a 30-minute conversation told Michigan Messenger that while he is unfamiliar with plans to use foreclosure lists to challenge voters, he does expect party volunteers to challenge voters in other ways.

When asked whether Michigan Republicans plan to create a challenge list based on returned direct mail, a practice known as “vote caging,” Doster replied, “I think so. I know this has been done in years past … both parties may be doing this.”

Doster said that the party’s deputy political director, Kelly Harrigan, would have more information about the challenge lists. Harrigan did not respond to a call from Michigan Messenger.

“Voter caging” is controversial because it can be used to target certain groups of voters. Some say that a piece of returned mail should not be enough to challenge a person’s claim of residency.

Last week Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner acknowledged that the use of mail for vote caging has disproportionately affected poor and minority communities and she instructed that returned mail should not be considered reasonable evidence that someone has moved.

Comments

[Michelle Roberts]

Congratulations!!! This article is featured in Just Sayin
http://connectplatform.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?blog_id=90703&cid=10&edit=

[hustleandfloe]

So, it looks like "voter caging" is legal - that a voter may be turned away from the polls upon being presented returned mail.

That seems odd. Odder that none of these sources quotes law for reference, just that it is known for racial use and "should not be considered reasonable evidence that someone has moved."

Not much help.

...looking this up.