Toward a Unified Theory of Black America

By STEPHEN J. DUBNER
The New York Times

Roland G. Fryer Jr. is 27 years old and he is an assistant professor of economics at Harvard and he is black. Yes, 27 is young to be any kind of professor anywhere. But after what might charitably be called a slow start in the scholarly life, Fryer has been in a big hurry to catch up. He was in fact only 25 when he went on the job market, gaining offers from -- well, just about everywhere. He abruptly ended his job search by accepting an invitation to join the Society of Fellows at Harvard, one of academia's most prestigious research posts. This meant he wouldn't be teaching anywhere for three years. The Harvard economics department told Fryer to take its offer anyway; he could have an office and defer his teaching obligation until the fellowship was done.

Now that he is halfway through his fellowship, the quality and breadth of Fryer's research have surprised even his champions. ''As a pure technical economic theorist, he's of the first rate,'' says Lawrence Katz, a prominent labor economist at Harvard. ''But what's really incredible is that he's also much more of a broad social theorist -- talking to psychologists, sociologists, behavioral geneticists -- and the ideas he comes up with aren't the 'let's take the standard economic model and push a little harder' ideas. He makes you think of Nathan Glazer or William Julius Wilson, but with economic rigor.'' Henry Louis Gates Jr., the Harvard humanities scholar, says that Fryer is ''destined to be a star. I mean, he's a star already, just a baby star. I think he'll raise the analysis of the African-American experience to new levels of rigor and bring economics into the mainstream area of inquiry within the broader field of African-American studies.''

Full article

Comments

[otherwise]

http://www.unionbt.org/wwwboard/messages/2306.html countyensconcedundeveloped

[early]

http://www.litefire.com/wwwboard/messages/7221.html archinghigherlose

[atw7300]

Analysis is rarely the issue. The issue is too often problem identification. This article presents Fryer's view as very conservative. The problem he seeming identifies focuses on individuals without grasping structural barriers and inequities. Let's reserve judgement until after we can peer-review his empirical findings.

[Deskwriter]

Does anyone really think that the problem for African-Americans is quality of analysis?

This Fryer business is juvenile jibberish.